librelist archives

« back to archive

Is a manual setup.py needed?

Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-11-28 @ 10:48
I've been trying to use bento and keep running into issues. When tracking them
down, it seems that they are all related to missing setup.py. Do I need to
create setup.py manually? I thought a bento.info file was sufficient?

I can install locally, sdist works, build_egg fails, any attempt to install
those artifacts in a virtualenv fail.

Thanks.

-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
David Cournapeau
Date:
2014-11-28 @ 13:21
Hi Yves,

Could you give us a bit more details about what fails exactly ? Which bento
command (and your bento.info file) ?

A setup.py should not be mandatory.

David

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> wrote:

>
> I've been trying to use bento and keep running into issues. When tracking
> them
> down, it seems that they are all related to missing setup.py. Do I need to
> create setup.py manually? I thought a bento.info file was sufficient?
>
> I can install locally, sdist works, build_egg fails, any attempt to install
> those artifacts in a virtualenv fail.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> http://yves.zioup.com
> gpg: 4096R/32B0F416
>
>

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-11-28 @ 15:31
On 2014-11-28 06:21, David Cournapeau wrote:
> 
> A setup.py should not be mandatory.
> 

I've submitted issue #148.

I'll send a bit more time on it to see if there's something obvious.


-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-11-30 @ 23:19
On 2014-11-28 08:31, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> On 2014-11-28 06:21, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>> A setup.py should not be mandatory.

I've added PR # 149 and PR # 150 which solves the wr_long error when running
`bentomaker build_egg`. Sadly it still doesn't create a setup.py, so pip
install in virtualenv still fails.

Is this project still active?
I don't mind trying to debug this issue, as well as getting the tests running
in python 3.3 and 3.2, but don't want to spend too much time if if the project
is stagnant/abandoned.


Thanks.

-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 00:16
So is it fair to say that Bento isn't ready for python 3.4 and won't be for
quite a while?

-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Ralf Gommers
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 19:50
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> wrote:

>
> So is it fair to say that Bento isn't ready for python 3.4 and won't be for
> quite a while?
>

Hi Yves, I'd say that the activity on this project is unfortunately quite
low at the moment and there are some rough edges. However, I use Bento on a
daily basis and keep numpy and scipy building with it without much trouble.
So overall Bento is in good shape and useable also for large projects.

I commented on your PR. Your help in fixing up the Python 3.x issues is
much appreciated, and I'm happy to test/review them.

Cheers,
Ralf

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 21:48
On 2014-12-03 12:50, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> 
> Hi Yves, I'd say that the activity on this project is unfortunately quite low
> at the moment and there are some rough edges. However, I use Bento on a daily
> basis and keep numpy and scipy building with it without much trouble. So
> overall Bento is in good shape and useable also for large projects.
> 
> I commented on your PR. Your help in fixing up the Python 3.x issues is much
> appreciated, and I'm happy to test/review them.

Thanks! I'll take a look at that PR tonight.

Any reason not to have a .gitignore (PR #149)?
Not having one makes for an ugly git status after you've run the tests...

-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Ralf Gommers
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 21:55
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> wrote:

> On 2014-12-03 12:50, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yves, I'd say that the activity on this project is unfortunately
> quite low
> > at the moment and there are some rough edges. However, I use Bento on a
> daily
> > basis and keep numpy and scipy building with it without much trouble. So
> > overall Bento is in good shape and useable also for large projects.
> >
> > I commented on your PR. Your help in fixing up the Python 3.x issues is
> much
> > appreciated, and I'm happy to test/review them.
>
> Thanks! I'll take a look at that PR tonight.
>
> Any reason not to have a .gitignore (PR #149)?
>

None whatsoever I think.


> Not having one makes for an ugly git status after you've run the tests...
>

Agreed.

Ralf

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Yves Dorfsman
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 22:31
On 2014-12-03 14:55, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com
> <mailto:yves@zioup.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2014-12-03 12:50, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi Yves, I'd say that the activity on this project is 
unfortunately quite low
>     > at the moment and there are some rough edges. However, I use Bento
on a daily
>     > basis and keep numpy and scipy building with it without much trouble. So
>     > overall Bento is in good shape and useable also for large projects.
>     >
>     > I commented on your PR. Your help in fixing up the Python 3.x 
issues is much
>     > appreciated, and I'm happy to test/review them.
> 
>     Thanks! I'll take a look at that PR tonight.
> 
>     Any reason not to have a .gitignore (PR #149)?
> 
> 
> None whatsoever I think.
>  
> 
>     Not having one makes for an ugly git status after you've run the tests...
> 
> 
> Agreed.


So can somebody merge PR # 149?

-- 
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

Re: [bento] Is a manual setup.py needed?

From:
Ralf Gommers
Date:
2014-12-03 @ 22:38
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com> wrote:

> On 2014-12-03 14:55, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com
> > <mailto:yves@zioup.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 2014-12-03 12:50, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Hi Yves, I'd say that the activity on this project is
> unfortunately quite low
> >     > at the moment and there are some rough edges. However, I use Bento
> on a daily
> >     > basis and keep numpy and scipy building with it without much
> trouble. So
> >     > overall Bento is in good shape and useable also for large projects.
> >     >
> >     > I commented on your PR. Your help in fixing up the Python 3.x
> issues is much
> >     > appreciated, and I'm happy to test/review them.
> >
> >     Thanks! I'll take a look at that PR tonight.
> >
> >     Any reason not to have a .gitignore (PR #149)?
> >
> >
> > None whatsoever I think.
> >
> >
> >     Not having one makes for an ugly git status after you've run the
> tests...
> >
> >
> > Agreed.
>
>
> So can somebody merge PR # 149?
>

I pinged David on the PR (I don't have commit rights - just a happy user
here).

Ralf